Log in
  

Stephanie Prange is the editor in chief of Home Media Magazine. The Yale University graduate joined what was then Video Store Magazine in 1993 and was instrumental in transitioning the publication into a tabloid newsweekly. She spearheaded the publication’s reviews section, as well as aggressive coverage of the home video sales market. She also helped launch the magazine’s Web site in 1996. In her position as editor-in-chief since 2006, she has spearheaded the launch of such projects as the daily blast, transmitted via email each day to readers, and Agent DVD, a consumer publication aimed at genre enthusiasts who attend Comic-Con International in San Diego. She has freelanced for The Hollywood Reporter, The Los Angeles Times and parenting publications. She has an M.A. in journalism from the University of Southern California.


Steph Sums It Up
Sort by: Title | Date
9 Dec, 2010

‘Shelf Space’ Issues for Streaming?


The recent dustup between Comcast and Netflix tech partner Level 3 Communications has brought to light a growing issue in the anything, anywhere, anytime brave new world of digital delivery.

Level 3 is protesting a new fee imposed on it by Comcast for transmitting movies and other content (the volume of which has jumped due to its new deal with Netflix).

Comcast claims it’s merely a distribution pipeline with limited resources, much like shelf space on the store floor. To expand that “shelf space” for Level 3’s new Netflix content, Comcast says it needs more compensation to deliver the greater flow of content. Level 3 says Comcast is doing its cable customers a disservice by not giving them what they want regardless of the content source.

Retailers for some time have charged fees to put products on endcaps or give them special placement. Shelf space is limited at a brick-and-mortar store and, in order to offer a broad range of products, the store may not necessarily be able to stock as much of a given product as consumers would like. The Internet, ostensibly, was supposed to be different, with consumers calling the shots on what they wanted to buy without restrictions. The new controversy calls that promised Internet nirvana into question.

In the case of Level 3, Comcast claims it is being asked to greatly increase the content delivery network’s allotted “shelf space” for its new Netflix traffic at no extra charge. Complicating the issue is the fact that Comcast itself wants the prime “shelf space” for its own cable and Xfinity service, which increasingly competes with Netflix streaming.

The key is how much traffic Comcast owes Level 3 at what price. It’s unclear just how much the extra traffic is costing Comcast, which is the heart of the problem.

Perhaps the upcoming FCC vote on this issue, dubbed “net neutrality,” will find some common ground. It may be that the Internet needs some sort of traffic cop to balance the wishes of consumers and streaming companies against the cost to companies that deliver that streaming and other services via the Web.

Unfortunately, the Internet’s “shelf space” may not be as easily defined as that of Walmart or Target. Which companies or persons bear which costs may be very difficult to determine.


29 Nov, 2010

Is There Any Money in Streaming?


Drowned out by the Wall Street hype about the growth of digital delivery, industry pundits (myself included) have often wondered if the economics of streaming content would ever work out.

Netflix’s bow of a $7.99 streaming-only subscription in the United States this week, on the heels of Hulu’s rollout of its “premium” service at the same price (after a price drop), may finally enlighten us. Each move starts to give the industry some way of quantifying the streaming offerings out there.

I was a big critic of Netflix’s decision to offer streaming at no extra charge at the outset, concerned that when you offer something for free, consumers are reluctant to pay for it afterward. I may be proved wrong in my initial reluctance to giving customers something for free. But I think most would agree that the ultimate test is a streaming service that makes a profit without leaning on the old-fashioned disc rental business (in the case of Netflix) or on free, unlimited access (in the case of Hulu).

Still, Netflix has somewhat muddied the streaming waters by offering the streaming-only service at the same time it raises prices for disc rentals. If you want to rent Blu-ray discs from Netflix, there’s an even steeper premium.

Each is taking a big gamble, and it will be interesting to see which has its finger on the pulse of the consumer. We are getting much closer to finding out if there is actually any money in streaming.

One anecdote from my own life: My mother recently signed up for Netflix. She checks e-mail only about once a month, so the idea of her streaming anything seems remote. When she gets wind of the fact that the price may go up, I’m not so sure she will stay on. Will other disc renters feel the same way? Will the sub price for streaming plus disc rentals plus the premium for Blu-ray make some re-evaluate Netflix’s offering? A dollar or two to rent a disc from Redbox may start to look really inviting.

In a poll at hackingnetflix.com, by Nov. 23 nearly half of respondents said they wouldn’t change their Netflix plan, while about a third said they would downsize their plan to save money and about 10% would drop DVD rentals to go streaming-only; 10% said they would quit Netflix.

Still, the jury is out, and I give credit to Netflix and Hulu for trying to quantify their product. I’m ready to get past the hype and move toward digital profit. The ultimate goal is an entertainment industry in which content owners, creators and distributors can make a decent profit.


22 Nov, 2010

TV a Big Part of Netflix’s Streaming


While Wall Street pundits have proclaimed that Netflix’s streaming growth is coming at the expense of packaged media, it looks to me that the subscription service’s streaming is actually complementary to traditional forms of entertainment.

In a recent speech, Netflix chief content officer Ted Sarandos said repurposed television shows account for 50% of streaming content for Netflix subscribers (see story). And now Netflix has bowed a streaming-only option (see story).

Sarandos rightly said that subscribers like to stream in short bursts, and that the service is complementary to existing cable and satellite service.

“It fits peoples’ lifestyles,” he said.

That makes sense to me.

While on a plane, at the gym or waiting in line, I’d like the ability to stream a TV show on an iPod, iPad or other mobile device. I’m not exactly going to haul around a laptop to view an entire feature-length movie on Blu-ray Disc or DVD just to run errands.

Even on the plane, where there are so many interruptions, viewing a short TV show on my mobile device cuts down on the amount of equipment I have to lug around and offers a snack-sized bite of entertainment when I may not be able to get fully engrossed in a feature.

Having access to Netflix on your mobile device is like owning a library of TV reruns that can be viewed to pass the time. I recently saw an amusement park attendee viewing her iPad while waiting for her kids to get off a ride. I doubt she was perusing an feature-length drama. I’m betting a TV episode would last about as long as it would take for her kids to finish the ride (it was a slow day, after all).

On a mobile device to pass the time, lower-quality video streaming fits the bill. Most folks aren’t looking for top-notch picture and sound while on the move, but just a bit of entertainment to pass the time while they wait in line at the post office or trudge on the treadmill at the gym.

That’s why Blu-ray sales continue to grow at the same time streaming services such as Netflix also flourish. They serve two different, but ultimately complementary, consumer needs.


14 Oct, 2010

What a Horror-ific Night!


The reputed ghosts at the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel  (among them Marilyn Monroe and Montgomery Clift) must have had a great time Oct., 12, as many of the most influential and celebrated filmmakers, actors and producers in the horror and thriller genre converged for the second annual Reaper Awards, presented by Home Media Magazine and DreadCentral.com.

The Roosevelt was home to the first Academy Awards in 1929 and served as a perfect, haunting setting for Reaper Awards: The Sequel.

What a gracious and welcoming family of talent the horror genre supports!

The host of guests at the cocktail party and dinner looked like a wedding party  — albeit a little offbeat one.

Lest we forget in our industry, the DVD/Blu-ray Disc release is often regarded by filmmakers as the only lasting testament to their work. I’ve talked to many a filmmaker who likes streaming and Internet distribution, but really wants that disc to have in their collection as a record of their effort. That’s why it is so rewarding to honor the work of folks who often find their audience via home media and live on via disc.

Lifetime Achievement Grimmy winner Tom Holland (Child’s Play, Fright Night) lauded the home media industry for allowing old and new fans to appreciate his films.

“These films are kept alive by multiple generations,” he said. “Parents pass these films on to their children, and when they [become adults], they pass them on to the next generation. Because of VHS, laserdisc, DVD, Blu-ray, [VOD], these films live on forever.”

Thank you to our generous sponsors who made this really cool evening possible: Fox, Anchor Bay, FEARnet, Warner, Sony, eOne, Image, Lionsgate, MTI, Paramount and Universal.

Thank you to my two right hands in helming this sequel: Angelique Flores, who handled the operations, and John Latchem, who supervised the voting process and created the video presentation. Also thanks go to other Home Media Magazine team members, Billy Gil, Melbert Sebayan, Renee Rosado, Chris Tribbey and Miko Revereza, who assisted at the show.

And a special thank you to Steve “Uncle Creepy” Barton, co-founder and editor in chief of our partnerDreadCentral.com, who was the perfect master of ceremonies for the evening.

We look forward next year to Reaper: Part III.


30 Sep, 2010

Blu-ray’s Penetrating Questions


Blu-ray Disc format penetration is growing, despite competition from old stalwart DVD. The format’s penetration has doubled since July 2008, with 17% of U.S. households owning at least one Blu-ray device in July 2010, according to research from Centris Market Intelligence (see story, cover). I’d say that’s a pretty good run so far for a high-def disc that only won the format war in February 2008 and then faced a brutal recession.

Unfortunately, Blu-ray still can’t catch a break, even while gaining significant ground. Industry pundits are still pointing out that it’s no DVD. But I think that was clear from the beginning. Blu-ray always was destined to be different from its predecessor. I didn’t expect it to match the pattern of the first disc format to be sold directly to consumers in breadth. DVD had the advantage of the first crack at truly selling catalog directly to consumers, in addition to the inception of the TV DVD business. No one bought much TV product on VHS.

In comparison to DVD’s advantages in the marketplace when it debuted, Blu-ray has a harder row to hoe. What may make Blu-ray a bigger star is 3D.

In the 3D arena, Blu-ray has a clear advantage over video-on-demand and Internet streaming options. Those two distribution avenues cannot possibly match the quality of 3D on Blu-ray. The application could in fact offer a new dimension to Blu-ray sales.

At first, I admittedly was a little skeptical about the 3D wave, and it’s potential for the high-definition format. I’d seen a few bad versions of the new 3D technology (one film actually gave me a headache), and I couldn’t see how that would possibly be an engine for growth in the home.

But now I’ve noticed growing studio and hardware support behind 3D — even in hard economic times. 

Anecdotally, 3D in the home seems to be fascinating consumers as well. At a recent Costco, I noticed an older man comment to his wife that the picture on a flat-screen TV on display looked blurry, which sounded like a bad sign for 3D. Then, he noticed the glasses in front of the TV, and looked through.

“Oh, wow!” he said.

That same “wow” factor may be the ticket to more Blu-ray growth.


9 Sep, 2010

3D Bundling a Smart Move


One of the most difficult hurdles to overcome with the launch of HDTV — due to the HD DVD versus Blu-ray Disc format war — was the confusion about high-definition disc content. Certain content wouldn’t play on certain players. By avoiding that problem with Blu-ray and 3DTV, the industry seems to have gotten it right this time. Content, instead of confusing the issue, can be a major boost to the adoption of a new dimension in TVs.

By bundling major 3D theatrical hits with 3DTVs, studios and consumer electronics manufacturers are offering buyers an instant “wow” factor. Consumers can go home with their electronics purchase and immediately get the full benefit of 3D without the worry that they’ve got a disc that may soon become obsolete.

Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment and Sony Electronics are partnering for consumer and retail education, promotion, and marketing support of in-home 3D devices, including bundling 3D Blu-ray versions of recent box office hit Alice in Wonderland and family favorite Bolt with the electronics. Meanwhile, Panasonic is reportedly partnering with 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment  to bundle its 3DTVs with the 3D Blu-ray release of box office sensation Avatar in December, and Samsung is collaborating with DreamWorks Animation to bundle How to Train Your Dragon and select “Shrek” films with 3DTVs this fall.

I’ve already seen enticing and reasonably priced displays of 3DTVs with the whole setup, including the 3D Blu-ray player. Add a movie such as Alice in Wonderland, Avatar or How to Train Your Dragon to the bundle, and it’s even easier to close the sale.

But the studios aren’t doing this merely to help out their friends in the electronics industry.

While electronics companies are obviously benefitting from studio content, the studios ultimately may be the bigger winners. As was often noted during the high-definition format war, sell the razor and make money for years to come on the razorblades. Content in 3D plays on any of the 3DTVs out there. This time around, the studios’ “razorblades” work with any of the “razors” out there.

With the hits the studios are bundling with 3DTVs, it looks like the format’s electronics may start moving off retail shelves this holiday season despite the bad economy. And that will mean studio sales of 3D Blu-rays for many seasons to come, and a new lease on life for a Blu-ray format increasingly facing competition from high-definition digital delivery. Blu-ray’s advantage has always been its high quality of sound and picture. The new 3D format will again show off the fact that Blu-ray is the best way to watch movies.


26 Aug, 2010

Honoring the Best in the Business


We’re in awards season here at Home Media Magazine.

A few weeks ago we announced the top discs of 2009 with our annual DVD Critics Awards (Warner Home Video’s glorious Wizard of Oz re-release took top honors) and next week we will honor the best in high-definition Blu-ray Discs.

There are so many great people behind these discs, from the sales and marketing executives to the supplemental material producers to the replicators and authoring companies. We appreciate your hard work and relish the opportunity to recognize it.

And there’s more to come.

Our panel of horror judges is evaluating titles and choosing the nominees for our annual Reaper Awards. The awards, honoring the best discs in the horror genre, will be presented Oct. 12 at a gala dinner and cocktail reception at the legendary (and haunted) Roosevelt Hotel in Los Angeles. We’ve had more than 100 submissions for the nominee process, and there is some truly great product out there. We’ll be announcing those final nominees vying to receive a coveted Grimmy soon. Home Media Magazine is co-presenting the Reaper Awards with the in-the-know horror site DreadCentral.com. DreadCentral’s editor-in-chief and co-founder Uncle Creepy is again set to host the show — and we look forward to a frightfully good party.

Also, coming in late October is our much-anticipated annual Women in Home Entertainment issue, in which we honor the savvy and capable women who help make this industry what it is. We will soon set up an online nomination process for that honor. Until then, please pass on nominees to me. It’s really a pleasure to honor the great women in our business, and I look forward to this issue every year.

In these recessionary times, our industry (and everyone) can use something to celebrate. The Home Media Magazine team sees our mission as both informing the home media industry through our website and magazine and enthusiatically trumpeting its top accomplishments. Offering these awards and galas is one of the ways we like to complete that mission.

It’s our pleasure, and we welcome your enthusiastic input in the process.


12 Aug, 2010

Studios Tout Varied Window Dressing


It’s been the Wild Wild West of windows so far this year from the studios, and the freewheeling ways show no signs of stopping.

In last week’s issue, Warner chief Jeff Bewkes said his studio’s later windows for Netflix and Redbox were boosting digital and disc sales, while Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman said Paramount’s decision to offer those outlets discs at the same time as others had little effect on its fortunes.

This week, Lionsgate co-COO Steve Beeks reiterated his studio’s plan not to window Redbox releases. When asked if the studio would hold back the high-profile actioner The Expendables from Redbox later this year, Beeks said he doubted it. But the decision was far from definitive.

“Right now we are planning on selling [Expendables] to Redbox, but we do have some flexibility on that deal if things look differently in the future,” Beeks said.

Meanwhile, Lionsgate execs said offering digital in the same window as disc had little effect on disc sales while adding to the bottom line.

In this week’s issue, Disney chief Bob Iger says the studio is looking into releasing titles in advance of packaged media and digital at premium VOD pricing.

“There are people, we believe, who like to see movies sooner rather than later and would pay a premium price to do that,” Iger said.

On the digital side, he said that when renewing Disney’s third-party movie distribution agreement with Starz it agreed to the cable provider licensing streaming content to Netflix.

“We could actually benefit through Netflix growth through that deal,” he said, adding that by Netflix reaching certain revenue “thresholds,” Disney generates additional incremental revenue.

This varied window dressing points to one conclusion: The jury’s still out on the most profitable release schedule for sellthrough and rental of disc and digital. Each studio seems to be choosing their windows differently, perhaps based on the particular appeal of their product. Iger, for instance, noted that Pixar titles still sell well on disc, despite the challenging economic environment.

My guess is it will take many more financial quarters and a return to more stable economic times for the most profitable window pattern to emerge.


29 Jul, 2010

Title Contraction Paring Disc Sales?


DEG: The Digital Entertainment Group released first-half numbers last month showing packaged-media sales had dropped 3% in the second quarter which, after factoring in a steep first-quarter shortfall, resulted in a 7.1% drop in sales for the first half.

Certainly the economy is hitting disc sales, albeit less drastically than it did in Q1. But it may also be the title count that is hurting the sellthrough business. For the first half, the number of DVD releases fell by about 1,000 titles, according to The DVD & Blu-ray Release Report, put together by editor Ralph Tribbey. While half of that shortfall can be attributed to the special interest category, the rest includes core catalog and new-release titles. Meanwhile, Blu-ray title counts aren’t picking up enough to fill in that hole. The count of Blu-rays is up 18.4% for the first half, or a year-over-year gain of just 90 titles, according to the report.

“It appears that as long as the economic numbers continue to be dismal, so too will be the [inventory] counts for both Blu-ray and DVD as suppliers pick and choose what gets released,” reads the report.

The chicken-and-egg proposition is: Which is hurting disc sales more, consumers unwilling to buy or the fact that there are fewer titles from which to choose?

The picture gets clearer when looking at exactly which kinds of titles are in short supply. The theatrical catalog release pace slid 32.1% in the first half, according to the report. Many of the other categories either held their ground or grew in title count.

It seems apparent that consumers are not opting to replace their catalog DVDs with Blu-ray and that many already have collected those older titles they most desired. For many, DVD may be good enough for many titles in their collection.

I’ve written before the Blu-ray had a hard act to follow in DVD, which reaped the benefit of the first real shot at selling the studios’ rich catalog. VHS was never highly collectible in the way DVD was, and Blu-ray — while better still than DVD — is facing a tougher economy and DVD-library exhaustion.

Considering the headwinds, disc sales are pretty strong, showing consumers’ continued interest in owning the content they love the most.


20 Jul, 2010

‘Inception’ of a New Dialog With Home Entertainment Consumers?


This last weekend I went to the movies for the first time in a while to see director Christopher Nolan’s Inception, a Warner Bros. sci-fi juggernaut that topped the box office for the weekend and created a lot of buzz despite being shown in good old 2D.

After the movie, ushers handed out questionnaires ostensibly from the studio asking viewers how they liked the movie, among other things.

At the end of the survey was the following question: How interested would you be in buying or renting Inception on DVD or Blu-ray Disc or ordering it on demand? Answers ranged from “Definitely” to “Definitely not,” on a scale of 1-5.

If industry participants don’t think the studios are seriously reevaluating the home entertainment market, then this survey should give them ample proof. Of the three choices, buying or renting on disc or ordering via on demand, the studios have definite favorites based on the amount of revenue coming back to them. Buying the disc or on demand pay-per-view would be the most profitable consumer actions to the studios. Renting the disc is not.

I’m not sure exactly for what purpose the studio will use this data. Were I conducting the survey, I might gauge the purchase intent for each movie and window each movie to create the maximum revenue for the studio. If consumers aren’t particularly interested in purchasing a film, I might offer it first via VOD and then on disc. If they show a strong interest in purchasing a movie, I would offer it before or at the same time as it appears on VOD.

I have no doubt studios are looking at every aspect of the home entertainment business to maximize their revenue — and consumers answering surveys like this are going to point the way.