Insights from home entertainment industry experts. Home Media blogs give you the inside scoop on entertainment news, DVD and Blu-ray Disc releases, and the happenings at key studios and entertainment retailers. “TK's Take” analyzes and comments on home entertainment news and trends, “Agent DVD Insider” talks fanboy entertainment, “IndieFile” delivers independent film news, “Steph Sums It Up” offers pithy opinions on the state of the industry, and “Mike’s Picks” offers bite-sized recommendations of the latest DVD and Blu-ray releases.
Except for their own plans to cash in on the downloading craze with the launch of MovieLink, the Hollywood studios have been oddly misguided in preparing for what promises to be a battle royal over illegal downloading, focusing their efforts on politics instead of technology.
Just as the practice all but destroyed the music industry, we're starting to hear rumblings about the potential destruction of the video industry by a Napster-like mechanism that allows consumers to easily swap movies over the Internet.
The studio line has always been that the threat is still too far off, given the fact that most computer users lack the high-speed Internet access to download those giant movie files and, while MovieLink — a collaborative effort among five studios — has received a tremendous amount of ink, the partners privately concede it's more of an attempt to stay ahead of the curve than it is to generate any real money, at least for now.
But the future may be closer than we think. Yesterday morning I came across an interesting article from the Associated Press that noted copies of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, the long-awaited sequel to Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone that opens theatrically this weekend, are already available on the Internet.
“Warner Bros., the studio that produced and distributes the movie, confirmed that pirated copies of the movie have appeared on obscure Internet sites that regularly offer illegal copies of first-run movies,” the AP reported. Warner has since denied that pirates successfully placed the film on the Web, contending the file was a decoy.
But the rest of the sentence provides some compelling food for thought. Note the phrases “obscure Internet sites” and “regularly offer illegal copies of first-run movies.” Let me point out that Napster was also once an “obscure Internet site” before it hailed down on the music biz and put a brutal dent in CD sales.
And the fact that it is common knowledge that there are sites that “regularly offer illegal copies of first-run movies” should have all of Hollywood sounding the alarms.
Technology is growing by leaps and bounds, and downloading entire movies will one day be as simple and quick as opening a Word document.
I don't know exactly what Hollywood should do, but they had better think — and act — fast.
That day may not be around the corner—but then again, who's to say for sure?
Over the weekend I started wrapping Christmas presents and found I had no purple ribbon, which I wanted to complement a particular wrapping paper. So off to the store I went, thinking I could find it at any drugstore or mass merchant at this time of year.
Not only did I learn I was wrong, but in my quest for the elusive purple ribbon, I found a surprising lack of shoppers.
I know I start holiday shopping earlier than most folks because, among other things, I hate competing with crowds and standing in lines. But I thought I would find a few early bird shoppers out there.
First stop: Target. I noticed right away that the parking lot was half empty, unusual for this time of year. The story was the same inside. It was Sunday afternoon and there were no lines at cash registers and enough sales associates to answer everyone's questions. But no purple ribbon, so on to Kmart.
Surprisingly, Kmart was busier than Target. Maybe it owes to fire sale prices, but there were more shoppers, though traffic was still light. While I was there I noticed all but one DVD standee was gone; that one was directly across from the electronics department sales counter. The rest of the DVDs are all under glass now, which can't be helping sales, even if it is controlling loss.
But no purple ribbon, so I was off to the dreaded Wal-Mart. A relative newcomer in my town, Wal-Mart was busier than either of the other two stores. But still not what I expected in the post-Halloween, post World Series environment. It wasn't even as busy as it was over the summer.
If this is any indication, this year's holidays are going to be a brutal retail season. It's widely believed it will be make-or-break for struggling Kmart, which showed no indications of “make” or “break” on this visit. Target, which typically draws crowds in my neighborhood, may lose a lot of ground to Wal-Mart.
As an anecdotal observation, I while I was there I broke down and bought a catalog DVD I wanted. For $8.78. Online, I could sell the disc used to another business for $5.30. Which totally defeats the purpose of rental, I might add, because I can keep the title for as long as I want or, if I was so inclined, I could resell it and not have invested more than a one-night rental would have cost at Blockbuster.
And Wal-Mart had a spool of purple ribbon, too.
I paid a visit to my local Blockbuster and Hollywood stores over the weekend to see how they were doing as part of their respective chains' continued transformation beyond their traditional rentail business.
It is, indeed, a heady time to be in the home entertainment retailing business as the holidays approach. DVD has fueled a paradigm shift in the home video industry from one of pretty much strictly rental to a significant focus on retail (both new and used); from one of just home video to now include a significant focus on video game software. And from what I saw, most shoppers seemed to be taking these transformations in stride, even amid obvious signs of transition and disarray.
Over at my Blockbuster there was no question the message was “Buy Your Videos Here!” The new store remerchandising plans were pretty much completed, with a dramatic sellthrough area greeting visitors entering the store and “Buy It” signs facing front and center. A large banner hanging over the center of the store floor proclaims a special for all previously viewed DVDs for sale at $9.99 and all previously viewed VHS for $4.99. There was also a significant section of new movies for sale and shelf talkers heralding the chain's “Price Match Guarantee” on new video sales, promising that “For all new movies for sale at participating Blockbuster stores we will meet any valid advertised price from a local store stocking the same new item in a manufacturer's sealed packaged,” a flyer at the front counter informed.
Limiting as we all know the offer to be, nevertheless it's a brilliant positioning message from Big Blue that customers can be fairly confident they're getting a good deal on new video purchases. Indeed, the flyer detailing the guarantee also advertised the availability at $19.99 for such upcoming new releases as Star Wars: Episode II — Attack of the Clones, Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron, Ice Age, Men In Black II, Austin Powers in Goldmember, XXX and others.
Interestingly enough, while the focus on the sellthrough section and New Release wall (where DVD and VHS have been combined) have transformed these areas, the catalog rental areas both for DVD and VHS seemed a bit in disarray. Large sections of shelf lay empty, some areas of DVD were presented face out while other sat spine out. Genre signage seemed missing on others. I did not bother to ask the clerks in what state of transition these areas were, as they seemed awash in videos behind the counter, but I can only sympathize with customers who were trying to find an old favorite on VHS.
Meanwhile, over at my local Hollywood Video, the store was in fairly good shape, as it had been reconfigured some six months or so prior, again emphasizing a growing selection of catalog DVD, as well as a substantial presence of previously viewed video offerings in DVD and VHS and end caps on almost all the aisles. But dramatic change is on the horizon here, too. Two large storage containers stood in the parking lot, stacks of new game hardware were piled in a corner inside and a sign warning of the store's eminent closure for a day foretold a new Game Crazy store-within-a-store coming to my town soon.
The winds of change are blowing and while it often means temporary chaos. But out of such chaos will come a new home entertainment retail environment that is dramatically changing before our eyes.
I just read an interesting article on the 20th anniversary of the compact disc. The launch of the five-inch music disc in 1982 sounds a lot like the DVD launch 15 years later — in the beginning, no one could quite figure out what to do with it. Early goals were not met. But then all of a sudden things gathered steam and before long consumers were replacing their music libraries and the vinyl LP was history.
This quarter, consumers are making an incredible vote of confidence in DVD. Video sales are through the roof, with new records being broken almost as soon as they are set and bonus materials — far from the frills many initially saw them as — are proving an irresistible selling point.
But while everyone is all cheery and optimistic, we should never forget that the CD story wasn't exactly one of everyone living happily ever after. After a few boom years the music industry went into a slump, and only after hundreds of record stores were shuttered did we begin to see a recovery — a recovery cut short by the advent of digital downloading and the record companies' pathetic attempts to address digital downloading by 1) ignoring it in the hope it would go away, 2) filing suit to stop it before looking at ways to join in the party; and 3) keeping CD prices way too high despite study after study that showed $19.98 list was far too high a price to pay for any artist, much less a new and untried artist.
DVD sales won't continue to escalate, at least not at the rate they have been growing these last two years. Then there's the red-laser/blue-laser controversy, with the quest for a new standard still unsettled. Just look at what's happening over on the audio side — there's a brutal format war going on between the Super CD and true DVD-Audio and neither side is making much headway. Even if both sides do hack out a compromise (or if one throws up its hands in defeat and goes away), there's still no assurance of success, since the record companies face the formidable task of selling the public on superior sound at a time when the CD still sounds just fine to most mainstream ears.
Will the next-generation DVD visionaries and strategists have an easier time at it? Only time will tell.
Fans of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring can expect to be well rewarded for the wait between DVD editions of the film.
It's no secret that the extended version debuting next Tuesday has more than half an hour of additional footage, but the lingering question has been whether New Line Home Entertainment could pull off an extended version that didn't look contrived, as so many extended versions do.
The answer appears to be a resounding “Yes.”
The word on everyone's lips after New Line treated a few lucky reporters to an advance screening of the extended cut last night was “seamless.”
This version is a treat for movie fans in general, not just Rings fans, because it's truly amazing how viewers walk away feeling satisfied without ever noticing where much of the new footage is.
There are a few scenes that anyone who saw the first version will recognize as extended – notably the backstory on Galadriel's gifts to the members of the fellowship and a few extended battle scenes.
But the real magic is in the smaller insertions, the details woven in so skillfully that they make the tapestry of the story richer in an almost subliminal way. These micro extensions are so small that anyone who's read the book will have to think twice about whether they saw that detail in the last movie or just imagined it because they knew the story.
All that remains to be seen is how well the two special editions – one a four-disc boxed set and the other that set plus a handful of Rings memorabilia -- will sell. The volume of copies of the first version sold means a lot of people may be reluctant to shell out for another copy, at least out of the gate.
But there's also a significant group, myself included, that didn't care to buy a copy of the first version because we knew this one was coming. In my case, that's all about the extended film, not the extras, which may hold treasures of their own.
I'm predicting that not only will the extended version do well in this new release, but that copies of the first version will start showing up in used DVD bins in droves as consumers learn how good the extended version really is and start trading off the copies the new version relegates to mere stopgaps.
Like the story, the lure of the Ring is strong and the temptation great. And the spoils will go to those who stuck out the journey, whether their fans or filmmakers.
As fans anxiously await the theatrical debut of the second installment in the ‘Lord of the Rings' trilogy, The Two Towers, Dec. 18, sure enough the title showed up on the file-trading circuit more than a month before its debut.
A friend who shall remain nameless frequently checks file-trading sites for me and came across this title over the weekend. But appearances are deceiving.
Since file names on such sites often aren't what they seem, my friend checks the accuracy of the moniker by doing a “search for alternates.” This step helps determine the accuracy of the file title by showing other titles with the same digital identifier. What came up was a collection of music, what looked like an Italian version of Two Towers, what looked like porn films, as well as files named Spider-Man, Men in Black II and Star Wars: Attack of the Clones. Had my friend taken the time (most likely more than eight hours) to download the file named The Two Towers, most likely he would have gotten no such thing. Who knows what he would have gotten. It could have been the Italian version of Two Towers, Spider-Man, some other movie or music file or a porn title I can't publish here.
Internet geek-types call this “spoofing.” And this practice of purposefully planting misnamed shill files can cause headaches for the file-sharing community. It works on the law of diminishing returns: The more junk that is mixed in the peer-to-peer network brew, the more determined a file-trader has to be -- and the more time he or she has to spend -- to sift out what he or she wants. To some, it's a game they are willing to play, but my bet is most consumers aren't willing to waste their time, especially to obtain video files, which take many more hours to download than do music files.
While record labels and studios fight to strengthen legislation, the most effective defense may be to beat the traders at their own game. No one will be able to stop the most determined sharers, but the average consumer will likely skip the headache and buy the copyrighted movie through legitimate means.
By: Stephanie Prange
The phenomenal growth of DVD over the past several years has caused rentailers to remerchandise their stores in a way that truly demonstrates the split personality of the industry as it struggles to balance two significant formats in VHS and DVD. (VHS rentals, after all, have generated 66 percent of the 2002 rental business to date, or about $4.8 billion, according to Video Store Magazine market research.)
As DVD roared into the public mainstream, many, if not most, rentailers, including the big chains, aggressively built DVD sections, segregating the two formats. The point was to appeal to the growing legions of new DVD owners looking for movies to play on their shiny new machines.
But as player penetration nears 40 percent, and as DVD continues to grow and push VHS into an ever-more-subordinate profile (at least in public perception), the challenge has become how to serve VHS customers in an ever-growing DVD world.
Interestingly enough, Blockbuster seems to be trying out a concept that ends this segregation between formats by combining both DVD and VHS copies in their new release sections. (See cover story this week.)
This is not a new idea, as recent postings on the VSDA's discussion board on this very topic attest. In fact, a number of rentailers have been trying out the segregation vs. integration approach for some time, with successes and failures reported on both sides.
Integration accomplishes several things, proponents say. It serves to give the impression that the retailer has a huge new-release section; it allows DVD owners to grab a copy of the VHS version if the DVD is out; it allows a one-stop shopping experience so that you can pick up a DVD of one title for the parents while grabbing a new release in VHS for the kids to view in the upstairs VHS-only den; and it serves to expose the VHS-only customer to what's available on DVD as an incentive to become a DVD owner.
On the other hand, other rentailers believe integration can cause DVD owners to take the fewer copies of VHS available for those VHS-only customers if the title is out in DVD, thus not protecting VHS-only customers who don't have a choice. And segregationists feel it does more to build the perception that their DVD libraries have more depth and breadth. Some don't like the unorganized look of an integrated new release wall.
The fact is that whether or not integration is good for your overall rental business -- balancing the need to maximize the declining VHS business while growing DVD rentals -- is something that must be decided on an individual basis depending on your customers' needs.
Rich Thorward's sudden death earlier this week came as a real blow to many of us in the industry. As a journalist who's been covering this business since the late 1980s, Rich was a valued source and one of those rare birds who was as thoughtful as he was passionate about this business he loved.
Rich and I spoke a lot during the industry's first great shakeout of the early 1990s. He was a harsh critic of the studio establishment and a fervent protector of the independent retailer. After he left the retail side of the business — frustrated as many indies were — to launch his consulting and newsletter service, he channeled his energy and foresight into helping others. And I don't think I'm the only one who would credit Rich Thorward's knowledge with helping some retailers — maybe many retailers — remain competitive and solvent a lot longer than they would have without him.
I didn't speak with Rich as much after he left retailing, but in our periodic conversations at industry functions like the VSDA convention and the East Coast Video Show I could feel a sense of weariness that I'm sure we all feel from time to time. This business has changed so dramatically in the last few years, it's easy to see how insiders could feel like outsiders even though they are still in the proverbial thick of things.
Rich was a buying guru for independent rentailers at a time when the big chains had already knocked a good percentage of independents out of business — and the remaining ones just weren't that important to the powers that be in Hollywood any more.
That must grate on a guy, particularly the kind of guy Rich was. He knew his stuff, and he wanted to be taken seriously. He would have made a first-class consultant to some big chain like Wal-Mart or Best Buy, applying his years of experience in the business to the new consumer paradigm of buying rather than renting. But instead he stuck with the little rentaliers, and while he still had things to say, the expanding world of DVD retailing slowly seemed to drown him out.
Rich's passing, then, is a symbol of what could be construed as the passing of an entire era. The video rental industry, peopled by thousands of small entrepreneurs, has given way to a DVD sales machine operated by mighty chains who sell all sorts of other things besides video. And the Rich Thorwards of this world have been replaced by nameless, faceless consultants with fancy names like “category captains” who essentially fulfill the same function he did — helping their clients make more money — but on a far less personal basis.
My TV went on the fritz this weekend. Which is of no concern to any of you, but it changed my weekend schedule because I had a friend coming over to play a new DVD game (more on that next week).
It was an old set with just one AV hookup in the back so it seemed low yield to have it fixed. I speculated that holiday pricing would be in effect and went online to shop. Not that I don't enjoy pushing buttons and comparing picture quality hands on, I just wanted to narrow the field before going to the store.
I shopped at five online sites: BestBuy.com, CircuitCity.com, Buy.com, Amazon.com and Walamrt.com. The search led me to two conclusions.
One was that BestBuy,com offers the best online shopping experience. (Well, after a brief glitch. The section of the site I wanted to see kept freezing my browser so I had to switch to the hated Internet Explorer. But after that it was OK.)
I shopped each of the sites by category, to see what was available. Best Buy and Amazon.com dwarfed Circuit City and Buy.com for selection. The ratio in the size range I was looking for was something like 5:1. For every set I could find on Buy and Circuit City. Best Buy and Amazon listed four or five more.
For shopping experience, in terms of navigation and site design, Circuit City came in second. The selection just wasn't there but, as you'll learn momentarily, that did not cost them the sale).
What kept taking me back to BestBuy.com was the depth of information on each product. I would see something on another site but be unable to check the product dimensions (yes, in the postage-stamp sized apartment I can afford, size does matter!) or something about the features. On BestBuy.com the information was not only detailed, but the product comparison feature let me check off seven sets, push a button and look at the features side by side, in spreadsheet fashion.
Circuit City.com has a comparison engine, but it was less helpful because there was less data to compare in the first place.
Still, Circuit City got the sale because availability in Best Buy stores looked dicey from the site. Which leads us to the other conclusion I reached: Amazon.com and BestBuy.com appear to be feeling the strain of port labor issues.
I've gotten some good deals on Amazon.com, their selection is usually the largest, there's no sales tax and free shipping, so I thought I would be buying there. Instead, about 2/3 of the televisions listed on the site were unavailable new (the official message reads “This item is not stocked or has been discontinued”). Sure, if I had $3,000 or $4,000 to spend I could get a nice, flat panel, high definition set. But in my price range, there was very little available new. The site did have several used options, but that wouldn't do.
Just to verify and to take a reading for our industry, I also searched the DVD player category. The cupboard appeared similarly bare (no comment yet from Amazon, but I've asked).
The problem was less pervasive at Best Buy but the item I wanted was not available for delivery, I had to go get it. Which meant I bought from Circuit City, because the price was the same and Circuit City was closer. For a 90-pound TV set that obstructs the rear view, a shorter trip was important to me.
Just one problem: the set appears to be defective (it has purple tint bleeding into the picure from the lower right corner) and I'll have to return it for another one. So expect to read next week about why Circuit City kept or lost a customer, because when I go to exchange this set, the customer service experience will be the determining factor.
I am curious to see how Flexplay Technologies' new “expiring” DVD ends up being used in the marketplace. You might recall reading here about how the new technology differs from conventional DVD only in that it has a limited viewing window following removal from its packaging. After the allotted time the disc's content becomes unreadable on DVD players. The expiring DVD was introduced at the MTV Video Music Awards Latin America, inserted into the awards show program. The DVD contained music videos and other content from five of the nominated artists.
I am not going to get a brain sprain trying to develop the financial business model as I write this, but the manufacturer is promoting the Flexplay DVD as a rental option, as well as a marketing platform. I wonder about either.
Flexplay, on its Web site, promotes itself as a competitor to the rental market at the same time it makes an effort to distance itself from the old Divx technology that, as we all know, applied some of the same principles but failed because of technological limitations. Flexplay discs can play on any DVD player and will not have the limited distribution system Divx had.
But be that as it may, can retailers and studios make money with this technology? Perhaps there can be a decent margin created on a one-time-use product, but wouldn't it necessitate a huge volume of discs and transactions? I'm not sure mass merchants are interested in getting into even this form of quasi-rental business, notwithstanding Wal-Mart's test of the online rental business. It all comes down to the cost structure of these deals and I look forward to talking with Flexplay in the near future to have them share some of their ideas in this area.
There is some sense to using a self-erasing DVD to promote such things as new music artists or a new TV show. Offering a sampling of new artist singles from a label with a music video or other graphics that can be sampled one or several times is a great marketing tool to entice users to go out and buy a new album. Seeing parts of a new pilot episode might entice new viewers (although why make this erasable?). But I am not sure there will be a model there to entice people to buy (rent, really) such discs for even nominal fees when they can “own” the music by downloading it online, though Flexplay says its technology may help to dissuade piracy.
I am curious to hear any ideas you might have to the use of “expiring” DVDs. Email me.