Home Media Magazine » Wal Mart And Redbox Yea Or Nay 0
Font Size: A A A

Wal-Mart and Redbox: Yea or Nay?



By : Thomas K. Arnold | Posted: July 22, 2009
tarnold@questex.com


I’ve been chastized severely by a couple of people for a recent blog entry in which I blasted Wal-Mart for allowing Redbox kiosks into its stores because they directly compete with the chain’s DVD sellthrough business.


In that original blog posting, I surmised Wal-Mart had allowed kiosks in because it was losing faith in DVD, a point underscored by what I perceived as the chain’s lackluster merchandising of Blu-ray Disc, which is still behind lock and key, occupying a solitary endcap in a vast electronics department.


My two callers — and neither of them is a Wal-Mart executive, by the way — both stood up for the chain, which is responsible for about 40% of total DVD sales in the United States. It isn’t so much a case of Wal-Mart losing faith in DVD, they told me, as it is Wal-Mart simply being a smart retailer and following the money.


While it is true that for years Wal-Mart used the DVD sales frenzy to drive customers into its stores, the chain’s “loss leader” strategy wasn’t entirely of its own making, I was told. Wal-Mart never drove prices down, but, rather, reacted to deep discounting by Best Buy and others. As a result studios were actually making more money from DVD sales than consumers were spending on them.


Wal-Mart approached the studios several times and asked for lower wholesale prices, but the studios didn’t budge, according to my callers. So now that DVD sales are down and Redbox rental kiosks are red hot, Wal-Mart doesn’t feel any sense of obligation to prop up the DVD sales business in any way. Instead, the chain is going with the money and leasing space to Redbox.


By allowing Redbox kiosks into its stores, my callers argued, Wal-Mart is not just making money but also giving its customers a choice. Wal-Mart customers can still buy DVDs, but now they can rent them as well.


Readers, I’d be interested to hear you weigh in on what is clearly a divisive issue. Is Wal-Mart a big baddie that used DVD sales to drive traffic into its stores and is now turning its back on the sellthrough business and going with the hot new kid in town, Redbox? Or is Wal-Mart merely being a good retailer and doing something that can enhance both its revenue and its customer service?


I look forward to hearing from you.

Authors


More From the Editors


User comments

Commented by Jeff M.
Posted on 2009-07-22 16:20:21

My philosophy on this is pretty straightforward: I'm a DVD (and Blu-ray) buyer. I find the best possible price on a given title, sure, but if I know I'm going to like something, I pay the money to buy it and own it. I'll almost certainly re-watch it at some point; that's the way I am. But if I'm not sure, then I want to rent it. I had fallen out of renting for years, though, because Blockbuster and their ilk were too expensive, and made it too hard to rent in a lot of ways. NetFlix was tempting, but they take the "instant gratification" factor out of it (like Veruca Salt in the Wonka film, "I WANT IT *NOW*!!!"). Redbox and other $1-rental kiosks at local grocery stores (and there ARE others, though Redbox is easily the best of them) fixed those issues. So Walmart having a Redbox machine in the lobby isn't a problem. When a film hits DVD and I don't have a clue if it's any good or not, then a Redbox rental is in order to try it first. "Paul Blart, Mall Cop" comes to mind: it looked very silly and I did





NEWSLETTER

Sign up for Home Media's Daily newsletter to receive breaking entertainment news and other features.

POLL

Are Kiosk Rentals Hurting Sellthrough?

Submit Vote
- OR -
Click here to view results

SEND US

Send us video clips of home entertainment industry events and parties